<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BenchTec UK &#187; ddr3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.benchtec.co.uk/index.php/tag/ddr3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.benchtec.co.uk</link>
	<description>Welcome to BenchTec, the home of UK extreme overclocking and cooling.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:59:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A-DATA Vitesta PC3-12800 2&#215;2GB Kit</title>
		<link>http://www.benchtec.co.uk/index.php/2008/12/05/a-data-vitesta-pc3-12800-4gb-kit-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.benchtec.co.uk/index.php/2008/12/05/a-data-vitesta-pc3-12800-4gb-kit-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>r1ch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a-data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ddr3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/?p=202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here Jabski looks at a 2&#215;2GB DDR3 kit sent over by A-DATA. Read on to see how it fared in the benchmarks.
Let&#8217;s start with a little blurb from A-DATA:
&#8220;A-DATA Technology Co., Ltd., the global leader in memory products, has again released new DDR3-1600+ under Plus Series right after DDR3-1333+. Since Intel has improved its core technology, most of it could easily overclock to 400 MHz FSB that automatically increase memory clock to DDR3-1600. A-Data DDR3-1600+ is going to be the mainstream of overclock product.
DDR3 memory module consumes 30% less power ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here Jabski looks at a 2&#215;2GB DDR3 kit sent over by A-DATA. Read on to see how it fared in the benchmarks.<span id="more-202"></span></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s start with a little blurb from A-DATA:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;A-DATA Technology Co., Ltd., the global leader in memory products, has again released new DDR3-1600+ under Plus Series right after DDR3-1333+. Since Intel has improved its core technology, most of it could easily overclock to 400 MHz FSB that automatically increase memory clock to DDR3-1600. A-Data DDR3-1600+ is going to be the mainstream of overclock product.</em></p>
<p><em>DDR3 memory module consumes 30% less power than DDR2. The main benefit of DDR3 comes from the higher bandwidth made possible by DDR3&#8217;s 8 bit deep prefetch buffer, whereas DDR2&#8217;s is 4 bits, and DDR&#8217;s is 2 bits deep. </em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p> </p>
<p><em>Over the years, A-DATA has built a reputation for consistently high quality. To ensure stable operation over extended periods of usage, the DDR3-1600+ passes burn-in testing and rigorous dual-channel capability testing. The highest quality standards are maintained at every stage in the production process, to create a first-class memory product that combines high stability with high performance. Using a 128MBx8 pin layout, the DDR3-1600+ is available in 2GB (1GBx2) and 4GB (2GBx2) Dual channel kit version. Timing recommendations for overclocking are provided, making it easy for even beginners to implement overclocking.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>That said, let&#8217;s have a look at the kit&#8230;</p>
<p><img class="alignright" title="AD31800E002GM(O)U2K" src="http://oc.adata.com.tw/img_products/p-Eseriesx2.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="160" /></p>
<h2>Specifications:</h2>
<p>Suitable for: Desktop PCs<br />
Module Type: 240Pin Unbuffered-DIMM Non ECC<br />
Capacity Available: 4GB Dual Channel Kit (2GBx2); 2GB Dual Channel Kit (1GBx2)<br />
IC Configuration: 128M x8<br />
Transmission Bandwidth: 12800MB/Sec PC3-12800<br />
Cas Latency Timing: 8-8-8-24<br />
Working Voltage: 1.65V~1.85V</p>
<h2>Test Setup:</h2>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">Motherboard: Asus Maximus Extreme, Intel X38 Chipset.<br />
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E8600, 45m, E0 Stepping.<br />
PSU: Enermax Galaxy 1000w.</span></p>
<p>All Sub timings left on Auto.</p>
<h2>Testing:</h2>
<h3>Stock</h3>
<p align="center"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/vitesta012.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-208" title="vitesta012" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/vitesta012.jpg" alt="" width="312" height="348" /></a><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/vitesta010.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-218" title="vitesta010" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/vitesta010.jpg" alt="" width="312" height="348" /></a><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/vitesta011.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-219" title="vitesta011" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/vitesta011.jpg" alt="" width="312" height="348" /></a></p>
<p> </p>
<h3>1.80v</h3>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/vitesta004.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-212 aligncenter" title="vitesta004" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/vitesta004.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/vitesta005.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-213 aligncenter" title="vitesta005" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/vitesta005.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<h3>Still at 1.8v - Performance Level 7 (PL7):</h3>
<p style="text-align: center; "><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/vitesta008.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-216 aligncenter" title="vitesta008" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/vitesta008.jpg" alt="" width="312" height="348" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-210 aligncenter" title="vitesta002" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/vitesta002.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-215 aligncenter" title="vitesta007" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/vitesta007.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></p>
<h3>1.9v</h3>
<p style="text-align: center; "><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/vitesta003.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-211" title="vitesta003" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/vitesta003.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center; "><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/vitesta006.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-214" title="vitesta006" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/vitesta006.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<h3>Still at 1.9v - Performance Level 7 (PL7):</h3>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/vitesta009.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-217 aligncenter" title="vitesta009" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/vitesta009.jpg" alt="" width="312" height="348" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/vitesta001.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-209" title="vitesta001" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/vitesta001.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<p>I am afraid it wasn&#8217;t stable to do 32m but maybe with some more time spent with sub timings it would pass.</p>
<h2>Conclusion:</h2>
<p>I am very impressed with this kit. Ideal for gaming or your general usage PC. The one other 2&#215;2GB kit i have ever used really struggled to get near to 800 MHz with 2v through them. this kit can do cas 7 at 1.8v. Pretty impressive. The head room for more MHz once again isnt on par with 2&#215;1Gb kits but as said this would be more suited to a gaming rig or photo editing etc than to hardcore benching.</p>
<p>Many thanks to A-Data for supplying this kit for review <a href="http://oc.adata.com.tw/" target="_blank">http://oc.adata.com.tw</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.benchtec.co.uk/index.php/2008/12/05/a-data-vitesta-pc3-12800-4gb-kit-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crucial Ballistix Tracer PC3-10666 2&#215;1GB Kit</title>
		<link>http://www.benchtec.co.uk/index.php/2008/10/08/crucial-ballistix-tracer-pc3-10666-666mhz-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.benchtec.co.uk/index.php/2008/10/08/crucial-ballistix-tracer-pc3-10666-666mhz-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 20:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>r1ch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crucial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ddr3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/?p=98</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, K404 has compiled a comprehensive review of Crucial&#8217;s Ballistix Tracer PC3-10666 2&#215;1GB kit. Read on for more.
Crucial don&#8217;t need an introduction so I will skip the really basic stuff.
Crucial&#8217;s Ballistix Tracer line is aimed at gamers and case modders who want something a bit fancy. With surface-mount LEDs along the bottom of each stick, as well as flashing LEDs at the top that match RAM activity, the Tracer line is certainly eye-catching. The model up for review here is Crucial&#8217;s first for DDR3, but instead of releasing a product at ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, K404 has compiled a comprehensive review of Crucial&#8217;s Ballistix Tracer PC3-10666 2&#215;1GB kit. Read on for more.</p>
<p style="text-align: left; "><span id="more-98"></span>Crucial don&#8217;t need an introduction so I will skip the really basic stuff.</p>
<p>Crucial&#8217;s Ballistix Tracer line is aimed at gamers and case modders who want something a bit fancy. With surface-mount LEDs along the bottom of each stick, as well as flashing LEDs at the top that match RAM activity, the Tracer line is certainly eye-catching. The model up for <span class="highlight">review</span> here is Crucial&#8217;s first for DDR3, but instead of releasing a product at the high-end of DDR3 capabilities, Crucial have picked a fairly pedestrian set of MHz and timings for launch- 666MHz at 6-6-6 latencies. The lower spec allows a more competitive street price (no doubt in part to offset the bling,) and if that is coupled with the undeniably unique look, Crucial have the potential to be onto a winner.</p>
<h2>Packaging</h2>
<p style="text-align: left;">I believe I received a very early set of sticks that came in single-stick blister packs, therefore I cannot comment. For a case-modders line, blisters with an interesting background would be a better style of presentation than a plain cardboard box. Heres hoping Crucial are learning to show themselves off a bit more strongly- bling does sell, especially to the casual shopper!</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer014.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-172 aligncenter" title="tracer014" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer014.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<h2><span style="font-weight: normal;">T</span>he Kit</h2>
<p>The heatspreders are a flat black with chrome edge. The yellow, outlined-in-red lettering stands out very well from the base colour. The PCBs are black.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer015.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-173 aligncenter" title="tracer015" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer015.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a><br />
</span></p>
<p>When installed, the sticks display only their blue &#8220;under-lighting&#8221; for the first few seconds of boot, then the red and green activity LEDs kick in.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer001.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-174 alignnone" title="tracer001" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer001-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a> <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer002.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-175 alignnone" style="text-decoration: underline;" title="tracer002" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer002-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a> <a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer003.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-176" title="tracer003" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer003-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a> <a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer004.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-177" title="tracer004" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer004-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a> <a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer005.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-178" title="tracer005" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer005-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
<h2>Test setup, notes, drawbacks and assumptions</h2>
<p>Motherboard: Asus P5E64 WS Pro, Intel X38 Chipset, BIOS 0702.<br />
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400, 45nm, C0 Stepping.</p>
<p>Two low-speed 80mm fans were positioned over the RAM at all times.</p>
<p>All voltages were measured directly with a multimeter. I do not trust software readings. Ever.</p>
<p>There is more than one place to measure ground on a motherboard. If a PSU ground line is attached to a mobo hold-down screw and used as a measuring point, it reports a higher voltage than if the casings of the I/O plugs are used. I find the difference to be around 0.1V. For this <span class="highlight">review</span>, I used the PSU ground line as a reference level. This is the worst case scenario voltage. ie&#8230; if I report 1.80V in the <span class="highlight">review</span>, it would have been closer to 1.70V if I had used the I/O casing.</p>
<p>My motherboard does not allow VDIMM values of less than 1.75V if using the previously mentioned ground spot</p>
<p>A MAXMEM value of 600MB was used to limit the effect of random data scatter in RAM. The results should be more consistent using this method.</p>
<p>vNB values were changed where necessary to allow the RAM MHz to be stable. If values significantly higher than normal are used, they will be stated.</p>
<p>I did not spend hours finding the absolute limits of the RAM, I picked ballpark numbers that should be within reach of most owners. There will obviously be some variation between sets, so posting results obtained from the ragged edge would give a skewed <span class="highlight">review</span>.</p>
<p>Due to the way these sticks arrived, I do not think I received a matched set. its possible that retail sets will have higher ceilings.</p>
<p>No tweaks were used to speed up SPi32M. The longer the test, the better sign it is for stability anyway.</p>
<h2>Testing</h2>
<p>I will not insult the in-house test procedure or quality assurance by testing at default, so I will jump straight into the RAMs capabilities for tweakers and overclockers:</p>
<p>Sadly, I had very little luck in testing the kit below its rated voltage. No worthwhile results were obtained.</p>
<p>However, if I kept the voltage at 1.80V I was able to tighten up the timings:</p>
<h3>680MHz 6-5-5 1T, 1.80V:</h3>
<p>Nothing to be ashamed of! I could not improve on the MHz at that voltage, but by increasing the juice by 0.1V I obtained another 40MHz:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer006.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-186 aligncenter" title="tracer006" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer006.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="399" /></a></p>
<h3>720MHz 6-5-5 1T, 1.90V:</h3>
<p>If the timings are loosened to 7-6-6 1T at default voltage (remember that 6-6-6 2T is the default) the ceiling is lifted up to 780MHz!</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer007.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-187 aligncenter" title="tracer007" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer007.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="399" /></a></p>
<h3>780MHz 7-6-6 1T, 1.80V</h3>
<p>Again, adding 0.1V to the supply offered another 40MHz:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer008.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-188 aligncenter" title="tracer008" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer008.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="399" /></a></p>
<h3>820MHz 7-6-6 1T, 1.90V</h3>
<p>I see a pattern emerging&#8230; will it continue further?</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer009.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-189 aligncenter" title="tracer009" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer009.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="399" /></a></p>
<h3>880MHz 8-7-7 1T, 1.80V</h3>
<p>adding another 0.1V to supply 1.90V&#8230;.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer010.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-190 aligncenter" title="tracer010" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer010.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="399" /></a></p>
<h3>920MHz 8-7-7 1T, 1.90V</h3>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer013.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-193 aligncenter" title="tracer013" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer013.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="399" /></a></p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>For a low-spec RAM kit, this RAM offers a real range of MHz and timings options. Irrespective of FSB, there will be a good RAM performance option awaiting. Crucial did not have to use ICs of this quality given the rated spec, I am pleasantly surprised!</p>
<p>The CrucialUK site lists this at £108, which is £33 higher than the plain Ballistix equivalent. I believe this is in part due to it being a new line. The primary appeal of this RAM lies in its appearance- the look is still unrivalled. If it appeals, I would say this RAM is a very good buy- its range of working settings sees to that and act as a very nice bonus to the appearance. If the look doesnt float your boat&#8230;buy the plain Ballistix- it will probably have the same quality.</p>
<p>The downside is that Nehalem is near launch. Much has been made of the recent warnings about VDIMM values over 1.65V, and this kit will probably not be suitable for that limit. All major RAM manufacturers are working on the new JEDEC DDR3 spec, and Crucial will have revised tri-channel kits by the time it matters. Given that Nehalem maturity (and lower prices!) are still several months away, I beleive this RAM still has a place in enthusiast-level rigs.</p>
<p>My thanks to Crucial UK for the review sample.</p>
<p>Best place to buy is direct from source: <a href="http://www.crucial.com/uk/store/partspecs.aspx?IMODULE=BL2KIT12864TA1336" target="_blank">http://www.crucial.com/uk/store/part&#8230;KIT12864TA1336</a></p>
<h2>Update!</h2>
<p>I was asked about tRAS performance, so heres two runs with tighter settings: tRAS of 12 at 666MHz and 14 at 880MHz. Setting it to 10 at 666MHz provided a no-boot, and attempting 12 at 880MHz resulted in the same. No voltages increases were necessary- 1.80VDIMM was used for both.</p>
<p style="text-align: center; "><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer016.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-194 aligncenter" title="tracer016" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer016.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="399" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center; "><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer017.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-185 aligncenter" title="tracer017" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer017.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="399" /></a></p>
<div style="text-align: left; ">I was also asked for some runs at higher VDIMM. I had a suspicion about how it would scale, based on my initial results and I suspected right. </p>
<p><span style="color: red;"><span style="font-size: medium;">DISCALIMER: THESE RUNS WERE AT HIGH VDIMM. RUNNING THESE VOLTAGES WILL INVALIDATE WARRANTY AND PROBABLY SHORTEN THE LIFESPAN OF YOUR RAM. I ACCEPT NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DEAD RAM THAT RESULTS FROM PEOPLE COPYING THESE SETTINGS. NO-ONE FORCES YOU TO TRY THIS STUFF.</span></span></div>
<p><span style="color: red;"><br />
860MHz 7-6-6 1T, 2.00V</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center; "><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer010.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-190 aligncenter" title="tracer010" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer010.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="399" /></a></p>
<p><span style="color: red;">900MHz 7-6-6 1T, 2.10V</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center; "><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer012.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-192 aligncenter" title="tracer012" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tracer012.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="399" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I appreciate that these results need higher VDIMM than some higher-rated kits, but remember the baseline of 666MHz 6-6-6 please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.benchtec.co.uk/index.php/2008/10/08/crucial-ballistix-tracer-pc3-10666-666mhz-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corsair Dominator PC3-14400 2&#215;1GB Kit</title>
		<link>http://www.benchtec.co.uk/index.php/2008/02/16/corsair%e2%80%99s-cm3x1024-1800c7d-2gb-kit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.benchtec.co.uk/index.php/2008/02/16/corsair%e2%80%99s-cm3x1024-1800c7d-2gb-kit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>r1ch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corsair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ddr3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/?p=240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Corsair provide a high-end DDR3 kit to Sacha35, read on to see how they performed. 


Corsair CM3X1024-1800C7D 2&#215;1GB DDR3 memory kit
Today we look at the offerings of Corsair’s CM3X1024-1800C7D 2GB DDR3 kit bundled with the added Corsair Dominator DHX cooling as standard.
Here&#8217;s what Corsair have to say about it:
&#8220;The Dominator Series TWIN3X2048-1800C7DF G is a 2048MByte kit of DDR3 SDRAM DIMMs built using Corsair’s latest high performance heat sink with Dual-path Heat Xchange (DHX) technology coupled with a Corsair Airflow Fan. This part delivers outstanding performance in the latest generation of dual-channel DDR3-based motherboards. It has ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corsair provide a high-end DDR3 kit to Sacha35, read on to see how they performed. </p>
<p><span id="more-240"></span></p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-263" style="margin-left:10px" title="corsair2" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/corsair2.jpg" alt="" width="192" height="128" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Corsair CM3X1024-1800C7D 2&#215;1GB DDR3 memory kit</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Today we look at the offerings of Corsair’s CM3X1024-1800C7D 2GB DDR3 kit bundled with the added Corsair Dominator DHX cooling as standard.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Here&#8217;s what Corsair have to say about it:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><em>&#8220;The Dominator Series TWIN3X2048-1800C7DF G is a 2048MByte kit of DDR3 SDRAM DIMMs built using Corsair’s latest high performance heat sink with Dual-path Heat Xchange (DHX) technology coupled with a Corsair Airflow Fan. This part delivers outstanding performance in the latest generation of dual-channel DDR3-based motherboards. It has been tested extensively in popular DDR3 motherboards to ensure compatibility and performance at its rated speed. This memory has been verified to operate at 1800MHz at latencies of 7-7-7-20 at 2.0V VDIMM.&#8221;</em></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Impressive, now onto the specifications&#8230;</p>
<h2>Specifications:</h2>
<p>Timings: 7-7-7-20<br />
Frequency: 1800 MHz<br />
Voltage: 2.0v</p>
<h2>Packaging</h2>
<p>What’s in the Box?</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/1800c7d-009.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-258 aligncenter" title="1800c7d-009" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/1800c7d-009.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="365" /></a></p>
<p>A close up to see just how well these modules are made and the excellent packaging that the kit comes in.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/1800c7d-007.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-256 aligncenter" title="1800c7d-007" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/1800c7d-007.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="461" /></a></p>
<p>Dual-path Heat Xchange Diagram Optimized fins to maximize ambient airflow through the module array. Extruded aluminium heat sinks to maximize convective heat dissipation</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/1800c7d-008.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-257 aligncenter" title="1800c7d-008" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/1800c7d-008.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="267" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Dominator DHX cooling.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/1800c7d-006.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-255 aligncenter" title="1800c7d-006" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/1800c7d-006.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="184" /></a></p>
<h2>Test Setup:</h2>
<p>Motherboard: Asus P5K3, Intel P35 Chipset<br />
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E6850, 65nm, G0 Stepping</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/1800c7d-010.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-259 aligncenter" title="1800c7d-010" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/1800c7d-010.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<p>The Asus P5K3, Intel P35 Chipset motherboard offers a lot of over-clocking options and allowed us to test the memory kit that Corsair sent, as you can see in the Screen shot I was able to boot up with 7-7-7-20 timming @ 2000MHz with no problems at all and the system was rock solid.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/1800c7d-002.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-251 aligncenter" title="1800c7d-002" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/1800c7d-002.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="400" /></a></p>
<p>With only a speed from the CPU of 4500MHz the final time in supper PI 1m was just a tad over 11 seconds which is not to bad given that the operating system was fully blotted with applications still operating in the background.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/1800c7d-005.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-254 aligncenter" title="1800c7d-005" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/1800c7d-005.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="400" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Some Super PI 32m</strong><br />
A small amount of voltage increase of 0.2 volts needed to run the 32M test but still very good at 2.2 volts to the memory for this sort of speed, again do not look at the total time taken as this test was just to see how far the Ram would go.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/1800c7d-011.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-260 aligncenter" title="1800c7d-011" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/1800c7d-011.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="400" /></a></p>
<p>A quick run with Wprime 32m and 1024m to see how well the total stability of the system with these ram speeds showed it had know problems at all.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/1800c7d-012.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-249 aligncenter" title="1800c7d-012" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/1800c7d-012.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="400" /></a></p>
<p>Sandra Bandwidth.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/1800c7d-001.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-250 aligncenter" title="1800c7d-001" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/1800c7d-001.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="400" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Next up was to see just what sort of MHz this ram could do:</strong><br />
Unfortunately the ram was not able to do much more even with slacker timings, But still very impressive.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/1800c7d-004.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-253 aligncenter" title="1800c7d-004" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/1800c7d-004.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="400" /></a></p>
<p>But what sort of MHz could the ram do with tighter timings, not to bad with settings of 6-6-6-18 @ 1780MHz.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/1800c7d-003.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-252 aligncenter" title="1800c7d-003" src="http://benchtec.co.uk/benchtec/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/1800c7d-003.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="400" /></a></p>
<h2>Conclusion:</h2>
<h3>Rating:</h3>
<p>Speed: 98 / 100 <br />
Value: 90 / 100</p>
<p><strong></strong>I have no doubt at all about this memory and its Capabilities’ in the right hands and with a fully optimised operating system the worlds your oyster.</p>
<p>my experiences in the last few days with this DDR3 memory kit from Corsair has definitely improved my outlook for DDR3 memory and its future acceptance by the enthusiast crowd and with Lifetime warranty cover you cannot go wrong with this supper fast set of memory, that’s providing you can stump up the £300.00 price tag, but if you have the cash and want the best then this set of Corsair’s memory is for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.benchtec.co.uk/index.php/2008/02/16/corsair%e2%80%99s-cm3x1024-1800c7d-2gb-kit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
